{"id":45521,"date":"2024-03-14T10:21:56","date_gmt":"2024-03-14T10:21:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/manitimes.com\/can-europe-save-forests-without-killing-jobs-in-malaysia\/"},"modified":"2024-03-14T10:21:56","modified_gmt":"2024-03-14T10:21:56","slug":"can-europe-save-forests-without-killing-jobs-in-malaysia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manitimes.com\/can-europe-save-forests-without-killing-jobs-in-malaysia\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Europe Save Forests Without Killing Jobs in Malaysia?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The European Union\u2019s upcoming ban on imports linked to deforestation has been hailed as a \u201cgold standard\u201d in climate policy: a meaningful step to protect the world\u2019s forests, which help remove planet-killing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.<\/p>\n

The law requires traders to trace the origins of a head-spinning variety of products \u2014 beef to books, chocolate and charcoal, lipstick and leather. To the European Union, the mandate, set to take effect next year, is a testament to the bloc\u2019s role as a global leader on climate change.<\/p>\n

The policy, though, has gotten caught in fierce crosscurrents about how to navigate the economic and political trade-offs demanded by climate change in a world where power is shifting and international institutions are fracturing.<\/p>\n

Developing countries have expressed outrage \u2014 with Malaysia and Indonesia among the most vocal. Together, the two nations supply 85 percent of the world\u2019s palm oil, one of seven critical commodities covered by the European Union\u2019s ban. And they maintain that the law puts their economies at risk.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n